I have seen from the Intel D400 page you will be supporting the realsense drivers out of the gate. I am very interested in the potential for using multiple cameras to build up a highly detailed colour scan of our environment and see CVB as a good option for that. Especially if it can pre stitch the …

This is very interesting and I would also be interested in this for different applications.

Hello @FredI and @BBQRibs , I’m terribly sorry for the delay. I should have answered earlier. Regarding Release: Our intention is to deliver integration with CVB 13.1 however we might not be able to deliver on the first release of CVB 13.1. Short answer: It will be available soon rather than now. …

Hi @BBQRibs , Do you mean the realsense in general or the integration into CVB?

No worries for the delay @c.hartmann it was a speculative enquiry. Realsense + ROS We are already using this integration but thank you for highlighting it. Intel support this code base very well and its very simple to use. In regards to the questions 1.We are doing a couple of different detection’…

@FredI Yes the D415 should be the best solution. Pro: Smaller FOV at same resolution. I.e. better image. Better Projector. Might be insignificant. Cons: Rolling Shutter. Pictures with Movement might be a Problem. For Slam (or similar) it should be fine.

@c.hartmann thanks for confirming our thought on which camera is most suitable. Could you give any indication of when you might have the stiching tool set created? Would it be within the next 6 months? 12 months? Or beyond?

Hi @FredI , What we will be releasing in :cvb: 2018 in terms of 3D processing and handling capabilities will be a first step and a foundation to build upon. To give some background: The 3D functionality in :cvb: in the past (in the version range [10.x, … 12.1]) was based on parts of the Sal3D librar…

@illusive thanks for the clarification. It is good to understand a bit more about the road map, when the CVB 2018 3D release and the intel realsense support is released we will definitely investigate using it. If the stitching tool was there we would definitely be using it.

Point noted (frankly and that’s in fact also the kind of feedback we hope to get on this platform).

Hi @FredI , i thought about this a little bit. And realized the pro point “Better image” might be complete nonsense. These cameras don’t use the same optics / lenses. So this statement is a bad guess at best. Sorry.

Multiple Intel Realsense D400 + ROS

Third Party Adapters

FredI January 19, 2018, 10:11am 12

@c.hartmann I understood the point though, you will have more pixels per mm.

Topic		Replies	Views
Basic usage of Intel RealSense cameras with CVB Programming Questions csharp , acquisition , python , cplusplus	25	4082	May 16, 2025
Combining point clouds Programming Questions 3d	7	2685	October 7, 2019
How to get a Zivid Pointcloud into CVB Third Party Adapters csharp , 3d , match3d	2	903	August 3, 2021
Useful code snippets for CVB 3D image processing .Net API transformation , net , calibration , intrinsic , extrinsic	19	1546	November 11, 2022
Compatibility of Helios2+ from LUCID with CVB .Net API genicam , gigevision	1	235	July 18, 2022

Multiple Intel Realsense D400 + ROS

Related topics